Unveiling Motivations: A Conversation with a Trump Supporter who Voiced Threats Amidst the 2020 Election Controversy

Unveiling Motivations: A Conversation with a Trump Supporter who Voiced Threats Amidst the 2020 Election Controversy

"Behind the Threats: Unveiling the Motivations of a Trump Supporter Involved in the 2020 Election Controversy"

In a bold move, I reached out to Mark Anthony Rissi, a Trump supporter facing federal prison for his involvement in the post-2020 election turmoil. Despite residing in different states—Rissi in Iowa and myself in Michigan—our nearly hour-long conversation revealed surprising commonalities. Both Vietnam-era veterans and recent widowers, we connected despite stark differences in our backgrounds: Rissi, a 65-year-old retired construction worker disabled from decades of injuries, and myself, a 75-year-old former police officer turned television reporter.

Rissi's conviction stemmed from threatening phone calls he made to government officials in the aftermath of the 2020 presidential election and the Capitol riots on Jan. 6, 2021. While not a participant in the Capitol assault, Rissi vehemently believes the rioters were unjustly charged. His disdain for what he perceives as the sorry state of America, blaming Democrats for it, reflects sentiments shared by many in the U.S., making Rissi's story not entirely unique.

His targets were fellow Republicans—Clint Hickman, the Republican chairman of the Maricopa County Supervisors in Arizona, and then-Attorney General of Arizona Mark Brnovich. Rissi's threats, recorded via voicemail, were directed at Hickman after he declared the 2020 election audit fair, refuting claims of fraud led by Donald Trump. In the voicemail, Rissi lashed out, stating, “When we come to lynch your stupid, lying commie (expletive), you'll remember that you lied on the (expletive) Bible, you piece of (expletive)! You're gonna die, you piece of (expletive)! We're going to hang you!”

My decision to engage with Rissi sought unfettered opinions from someone unfamiliar with my journalistic history. I hoped our conversation might unveil the motivations behind his actions and potentially reveal a softer perspective behind the actions that will lead him to prison for the first time in his life. The exchange aimed to bridge understanding, exploring the complexities that drive individuals to threaten others over political differences in a deeply divided America."

"A Plea for Dialogue: Conversations with a Trump Supporter Amidst Threats and Division"

In a disturbing turn of events, Mark Anthony Rissi, facing federal prison for threats made in the aftermath of the 2020 election, made another threatening call in December, this time targeting then-Attorney General of Arizona, Mark Brnovich. As I delved into Rissi's story, grappling with the pressing question that haunts me daily—how do we save the country from the threat of destruction from within?—I considered the urgent need for open dialogue.

The blind trust of some MAGA supporters in a system that demands trust for the sustenance of our capitalist, free society is a troubling reality. Wearing long guns and resorting to threats against fellow Americans only serves to unravel the very fabric of our republic. The solution, I concluded, is a simple yet profound proposal: let's talk to each other. In the face of rising animosity and the erosion of hope, engaging in meaningful conversations and negotiating differing perspectives becomes paramount.

With this conviction, I sought to understand the man behind the threats. Could a one-on-one conversation bridge the gap and pull someone like Rissi out of the hateful quicksand he finds himself in? In sending him to my website, seekingjusticebp.com, which focuses on my work helping to free the wrongfully convicted, I aimed to offer a glimpse into my commitment to justice. Maintaining my identity as a reporter, I allowed Rissi to review my writing before publication.

In our exchanges, Rissi acknowledged his regrettable choice of words in the threatening voicemail, attributing it to a potential bout of PTSD. However, the lingering question remains: was he truly acknowledging the influence of misinformation, not election fraud, in fueling his aggression, or was this a strategic move to mitigate his time behind bars? The unfolding dialogue seeks not only to comprehend the complexities of an individual's perspective but also to explore the potential for change through genuine conversation, even in the face of deeply entrenched beliefs."

"Bearing Burdens: Unraveling the Complexities Behind Rissi's Actions"

Mark Anthony Rissi's tumultuous journey, marred by health challenges and emotional turmoil, offers a glimpse into the complexities that fueled his threatening calls and political fervor. Multiple surgeries on his knee, shoulder, and a deteriorating hip, compounded by a broken implanted metal frame in his back, paint a picture of physical pain and fragility. The emotional toll of sitting by his dying mother's side further strained his already compromised emotional "control."

During his time in Florida with his mother, Rissi grappled with pain, relying on muscle relaxers and morphine. He recounted listening to his brother's grievances about the purportedly "crooked" election in Arizona, a narrative that likely contributed to his increasing dissatisfaction. Nine months later, the FBI questioned him, revealing a selective memory regarding the threatening calls.

Rissi's explanations, while veering into excuses, lack an overt sense of contrition. When confronted with questions about the election, he adamantly asserted his stance: "I know who won in 2020, and it wasn’t Joe Biden." His rejection of the election results and frustration with the Republican Party, which he once identified with, expose a deep-seated disillusionment. Describing them as "traitors" and "wimps," Rissi expressed dissatisfaction with the party's response to the election and their pursuit of evidence against Joe Biden.

In a fervent monologue, he criticized the impeachment proceedings against Donald Trump, attributing them to a vendetta against the former president. Rissi's belief in a conspiracy against Trump, anticipating his return to the political arena with overwhelming support, underscores a narrative steeped in distrust and resentment.

As I navigated the conversation, Rissi's impassioned outpourings reflected a complex tapestry of personal grievances, political disillusionment, and a profound mistrust in the system. While attempting to comprehend the underlying motivations behind his threats, the dialogue with Rissi illuminated the intricate interplay of personal experiences and political convictions that shaped his journey into the realm of extremism."

"Navigating the Depths: Conversations with Rissi on Beliefs, Conspiracies, and the Future"

In the midst of a conversation with Mark Anthony Rissi, his predictions about potential harm befalling Donald Trump and his strong stance on conspiracy theories highlighted the intricate web of beliefs shaping his worldview. The prospect of a plane crash or a lone gunman scenario targeting Trump appeared to align with a narrative steeped in distrust and conspiracy. While I hesitated to label him a conspiracy theorist, the programmed nature of his beliefs became evident, attributing fault to "The Other."

Despite his fervent political convictions, Rissi sought to underscore that he is not inherently a bad person. Claiming to abstain from drugs, theft, and physical harm, he avoided delving into the broader implications of political threats and their potential consequences. His dismissal of the impact of intimidation tactics on politicians, such as the right-wing demonstrators terrorizing Clint Hickman and his family, underscored a lack of acknowledgment or connection between his actions and their repercussions.

With a looming four-month gap between sentencing and reporting to prison, contingent on the success of his upcoming hip replacement surgery, Rissi expressed concerns about the federal penitentiary he might be assigned to. As he faces the prospect of observing the next election from behind bars, his thoughts on the future of America revealed deep-seated fears and convictions.

In a somewhat contradictory stance, Rissi opined on the perceived madness over equity and inclusivity, suggesting that these efforts are wielded by those in power to divide and destroy the nation. Expressing a shared sentiment among those who, like him, feel silenced, he painted a bleak picture of the consequences for speaking up.

As Rissi's convictions unfolded, the possibility of meaningful dialogue appeared increasingly elusive. His heartfelt beliefs, though overwhelming, carried a peculiar encouragement. While asserting that the form of government should remain intact, he advocated for a wholesale replacement of individuals in Washington, D.C., including surprising targets like Mitch McConnell, challenging established political affiliations.

In this intricate exchange, Rissi's beliefs, a manifestation of his personal fears and political disillusionment, revealed a deeply divided perspective on the current state and future trajectory of America."

"Unraveling Unyielding Beliefs: A Quest for Understanding in the Face of Anger"

In my attempt to engage Mark Anthony Rissi in a dialogue, I had hoped to find a bridge, a pathway to temper the anger and unwavering dismissal of viewpoints not aligned with the Trumpian approach to governance. Listening intently, I pondered whether my strategy of simply providing a receptive ear was the right approach. Could I have, in some way, guided Rissi back towards a reality that didn't endorse a lawless revision of America? These questions lingered as I navigated the intricacies of our conversation.

Reflecting on whether I might have missed an opportunity to convey that fellow Americans, on the opposite side of Rissi's convictions, also harbor concerns about threats and the potential erosion of their voting rights, I wondered if a middle ground could have been reached. Could he have recognized that displaying firearms in a state house is not the American way of settling differences? Unfortunately, the dialogue did not unfold as I had hoped.

Rissi, while expressing anger over his prison sentence, remained unrepentant. In his final assertion, he made it clear that my attempts were futile – his mind, heart, and beliefs were impervious to change. Even acknowledging the events of 2021 as nothing short of an attempted coup d'état did not sway his conviction. To Rissi, Donald Trump remains the president, an unassailable truth that transcends all else.

As the dialogue came to a close, the realization dawned that, despite my earnest endeavors, the entrenched nature of Rissi's beliefs proved insurmountable. His unwavering commitment to a perspective that deems the 2021 events as just and Trump as the rightful president underscored the formidable challenge of bridging ideological gaps in today's deeply polarized landscape. William Proctor, a private investigator with a background in broadcasting, concludes this reflection on an encounter with an unyielding mindset, emphasizing the complexity of navigating diverse perspectives in the current sociopolitical climate."

"In the wake of an earnest attempt to engage in dialogue with Mark Anthony Rissi, the conclusion paints a sobering picture of the challenges in bridging ideological gaps in today's polarized landscape. Despite the hope to find common ground and ease Rissi back into a reality that doesn't endorse a lawless revision of America, the conversation revealed an unyielding mindset.

Rissi's anger over his prison sentence and his unrepentant stance reflect the deeply entrenched nature of his beliefs. Even acknowledging the events of 2021 as an attempted coup did not prompt a reconsideration. The conviction that Donald Trump is the rightful president remains unassailable to Rissi.

The quest for understanding and dialogue, while noble, encountered the formidable walls of a perspective firmly rooted in its own convictions. As the conversation concludes, it highlights the complexities and challenges inherent in navigating diverse viewpoints, underscoring the deep divisions within the American sociopolitical landscape."


Money, Tech