Reflections on a Disturbing Evolution: Navigating the Peculiar Landscape of Growing Old Amidst Mass Shootings

Reflections on a Disturbing Evolution: Navigating the Peculiar Landscape of Growing Old Amidst Mass Shootings

Contemplating Grief Amidst Tragedy: Reflections on the Alarming Evolution of Mass Shootings

In the wake of yet another mass shooting, this time in the tranquil town of Lewiston, Maine, my mind drifts to somber musings about florists and the nature of mourning in today's world. I wonder if florists in such places, once considered remote from the specter of violence, find themselves depleted of peace lilies, carnations, and white roses—flowers sought by those grappling with the profoundness of grief. In a world where tragedies seem to unfold with alarming frequency, I ponder if florists, even in seemingly serene locales like Lewiston, maintain a significant inventory just in case.

The poignancy of the moment deepens as I reflect on the apparent shift in societal response. Are there mourners anymore, I wonder, or do the flowers gather dust, overlooked and unneeded, regardless of the mounting toll of lives lost? This time, it was Lewiston, where the death toll stands at eighteen, with some still fighting for their lives.

I am old enough to remember a different era, a time when such horrors sent shockwaves through our collective consciousness. My mind races back to August 20, 1986, when a mail carrier named Patrick H. Sherrill perpetrated a heinous act in Edmond, Oklahoma—opening fire at the post office where he worked, claiming the lives of 14 coworkers and leaving six wounded before taking his own life. I recall vividly being dispatched to the scene by The Arizona Republic, alongside journalists from across the nation, as the phrase "going postal" found its way into our vernacular.

As a pediatrician, the haunting reality of every gunshot victim I've treated amplifies the urgency for change. In the aftermath of the Edmond tragedy, I found myself seeking solace in a local flower shop, hoping to leave a tribute at the makeshift memorial outside the post office. The florist, Jim Burdick, informed me they were temporarily out of flowers, inundated with orders in the wake of the unthinkable event. In those days, the demand was unforeseeable, but now, tragically, we can anticipate it.

The Edmond incident became a chilling prototype for our response to subsequent gun massacres. Shock gives way to the meticulous collection of details, the exploration of the shooter's background, and the narratives of heroic first responders. We honor the victims, and eventually, the collective sentiment emerges that something must be done. But, as history painfully illustrates, not too soon.

As the nation grapples with the harrowing aftermath of yet another mass shooting—this time in Littleton, Colorado, in 1999—the question lingers: Is America safe for our children? The pervasive sense of deja vu resonates as journalists converge on Columbine High School, where two armed young men shattered lives, leaving 12 students and a teacher dead, and more than 20 others wounded.

The disquieting familiarity of this pattern raises broader questions about the trajectory of a society grappling with the evolution of mass shootings. In the ebb and flow of grief, I find myself contemplating not only the flowers that may or may not find their way to makeshift memorials but also the urgency for a collective reckoning with the disturbing frequency of such tragedies. The narrative unfolds, and the quest for change persists, for the sake of those we have lost and the countless others whose lives hang in the balance.

Reflections on a Disturbing Evolution: The Shifting Narrative Surrounding Mass Shootings

In the aftermath of the recent tragedy in Lewiston, Maine, I find myself reflecting on a bygone era when mass shootings, like the one in Edmond, Oklahoma, shocked our collective conscience. I recall covering the aftermath of the 1986 incident, a time when such horrors were met with disbelief and swift calls for change. Yet, as the years unfolded and the toll of mass shootings escalated—reaching 566 incidents in the current year alone according to the Gun Violence Archive—a disquieting transformation in our perception has occurred.

I vividly remember the fervor that surrounded the National Rifle Association's decision to proceed with its convention in Denver, even as thousands of protesters clamored for national action on gun violence. The late actor and then-NRA President Charlton Heston's impassioned defense of the Second Amendment seems almost quaint in retrospect. Today, the NRA no longer feels compelled to make bold statements. Mass shootings have become so pervasive that they seem to be assimilated into our collective consciousness as acts of nature, akin to floods or wildfires.

The grim reality is that, with each tragic incident, our response has shifted. We no longer approach these events with the belief that they can be prevented or deterred. Instead, we seem resigned to a sense of inevitability, merely keeping score of the lives lost. The 18 souls taken in Maine now rank among the top 10 deadliest incidents, following closely behind the 21 lives lost in Uvalde, Texas, and preceding the 17 casualties in Parkland, Florida. The toll mounts, and our perception of these events becomes increasingly desensitized.

Amid the clamor for action, a familiar refrain emerges from politicians and the powerful gun lobby—the call for time to grieve before contemplating change. This delay tactic, echoed in the aftermath of countless tragedies, has become a disheartening norm. While good people demand action, the urgency dissipates, and the mourning continues unabated.

As we grapple with the disconcerting evolution of our response to mass shootings, the question lingers: When will the tipping point be reached, compelling us to break free from the cycle of delay and take meaningful action? The column by EJ Montini serves as a poignant reminder of the ongoing struggle to reconcile with a tragic reality and the imperative to confront it head-on.

Navigating the Shadows of Tragedy, A Call for Defiant Action

In the sobering reflection on the evolution of our response to mass shootings, EJ Montini's column serves as a stark reminder of the disconcerting journey we've undertaken as a society. The once-shocking horrors have morphed into a grimly familiar narrative, where tragedy begets mourning, and the call for action is met with a refrain of delay.

As the toll of mass shootings continues to climb, reaching an alarming 566 incidents this year alone, the urgency for change becomes increasingly pronounced. Montini's recounting of past events, from Edmond to Lewiston, underscores the disturbing transformation in our collective consciousness. Mass shootings, once viewed as human-caused tragedies, now evoke a sense of inevitability, akin to natural disasters.

The poignant observation that we no longer perceive these incidents as preventable or deterable raises a crucial question: When will we defy the inertia of delay and confront the pressing need for change head-on? The conclusion echoes the familiar pattern of mourning that persists indefinitely, highlighting the cyclical nature of our response.

In the shadows of tragedy, a defiant call for action emerges. The column prompts introspection about the tipping point that will propel us beyond the scorekeeping mentality to a decisive commitment to prevent further loss of life. Montini's words serve as an urgent plea to break free from the shackles of delay and embrace a future where the narrative surrounding mass shootings transforms from one of resignation to one of resilient, unwavering resolve. The journey ahead demands a collective reckoning, challenging us to rise above the numbing cycle of grief and insist on a society that refuses to accept tragedy as an immutable fate.


Money, Tech