Unveiling the 'Blind Side' Conservatorship: Beyond Michael Oher's Story, Examining the Realities of Legal Guardianship

Unveiling the 'Blind Side' Conservatorship: Beyond Michael Oher's Story, Examining the Realities of Legal Guardianship

Unraveling the Enigma: Michael Oher's Conservatorship Raises Legal Eyebrows in Tennessee

A legal puzzle is taking center stage in Tennessee as attorneys across the state grapple with the intricacies of Michael Oher's conservatorship and the ensuing legal saga. The narrative begins on August 9, 2004, when a lawyer in Hernando, Mississippi, filed a petition at the behest of Sean Tuohy and Leigh Anne Tuohy, seeking to be appointed conservators over Michael Oher, referred to as the "Respondent."

The petition, while requesting "full co-legal custody, guardianship, and conservatorship" over Oher, raises eyebrows by simultaneously prohibiting Oher from entering into contracts independently, despite claiming he has "no known physical or psychological disabilities." Signed by both the Tuohys, Oher's mother, and Oher himself, the petition swiftly leads to a court order granting the Tuohys authority over Oher's medical decisions and contractual matters.

Remarkably, the court, for the subsequent 19 years, does not demand evidence of disability, nor does it mandate annual status reports or accountings—a departure from the typical legal protocol for conservatorships in Tennessee. Contrary to the standard procedure, which necessitates clear and convincing evidence, often backed by a physician's report, the court's oversight appears irregular.

Adding to the complexity, there is no indication of a concurrent custody or adoption proceeding, which typically accompanies conservatorships. Notably, the Tuohys had the option to adopt Oher even after he turned 18, a process distinctly different from conservatorships, as it doesn't strip away any rights from the individual.

In stark contrast to Tennessee law governing conservators, the Tuohys did not file the mandatory annual accountings and status reports. This deviation from legal norms prompts reflections on the appropriateness of the conservatorship system, particularly in the wake of high-profile cases like Britney Spears' abusive conservatorship.

Fast forward to August 2023—19 years since the conservatorship's inception—Michael Oher files a petition to terminate the arrangement, demanding accountability from the Tuohys. As the legal community closely watches this unfolding legal drama, questions persist about the adherence to legal standards and the implications for conservatorship practices in Tennessee.

Unraveling the Legal Tapestry: Tuohys' Response and the Complex Layers of Oher's Conservatorship

The plot thickens in the Michael Oher conservatorship saga as the Tuohys, central figures in this legal drama, have now filed their response. Their defense contends that they never communicated to Oher an intention to adopt him, asserting that their primary motive behind seeking conservatorship was to facilitate Oher's eligibility to play for the University of Mississippi ("Ole Miss"). According to the Tuohys, NCAA recruiting rules could have posed a hindrance if they supported Oher without him being officially part of their family.

In their statement, the Tuohys acknowledge referring to Oher as a son and feeling a paternal connection but emphasize that such expressions were not made in a legal context. They position themselves as guardians motivated by a desire to support Oher's athletic pursuits within the bounds of NCAA regulations.

A curious twist emerges as a brief exploration reveals the Tuohys' co-authorship of a book titled "In a Heartbeat: Sharing the Power of Cheerful Giving," available on Amazon. The book's description links it to the "remarkable couple depicted in ‘The Blind Side’" and the "story of Michael Oher and the family who adopted him." This revelation raises questions about the various ways the Tuohys may have benefited from the narrative surrounding Oher, beyond financial gains.

The legal landscape takes a turn with Judge Kathleen N. Gomes, presiding over the Oher case in Memphis, entering an order in September to terminate the conservatorship while retaining other unresolved issues, including Oher's pursuit of accountings and damages. As this lawsuit unfolds, the case's complexities become increasingly apparent.

The language used in the original petition, referencing guardianship and custody alongside conservatorship, may have contributed to potential confusion for an 18-year-old like Oher. The unfolding details underscore the need for scrutiny in cases involving legal guardianship, particularly when intertwined with personal relationships and potential financial interests.

The path ahead promises further revelations as this legal narrative continues to unfold. The unsettling nature of the case raises broader questions about the ethical dimensions of conservatorships and the potential exploitation of vulnerable individuals. Barbara Moss, founder of Elder Law of Nashville PLC, first shared insights into this evolving story in The Commercial Appeal in Memphis, Tenn. As the legal community awaits the next chapter, the case of Michael Oher's conservatorship remains a thought-provoking and concerning legal quandary.

Unanswered Questions Linger in Oher's Conservatorship Tale

As the legal dust settles in the Michael Oher conservatorship case, the responses from the Tuohys add another layer of complexity to an already intricate narrative. The Tuohys' assertion that their pursuit of conservatorship was solely to navigate NCAA regulations for Oher's benefit raises eyebrows, especially given the absence of proof of disability and the unusual lack of legal formalities in the subsequent 19 years.

The revelation of the Tuohys' co-authorship of a book, intertwined with the narrative of Oher's adoption, introduces a nuanced dimension to the story, prompting reflections on the potential multifaceted gains surrounding Oher's journey. The termination of the conservatorship by Judge Kathleen N. Gomes in Memphis, while retaining unresolved issues, signals that the legal saga is far from concluded.

The language complexities in the original petition, coupled with Oher's young age at the time, invite considerations of confusion and underline the need for scrutiny in legal guardianship cases, particularly when personal relationships and potential financial interests are intertwined.

As this lawsuit progresses, the case raises broader questions about the ethical dimensions of conservatorships and the possible exploitation of vulnerable individuals. Barbara Moss's initial insights into this unfolding story in The Commercial Appeal leave the legal community and the public awaiting the next chapter with a mix of anticipation and concern. The conclusion remains elusive, leaving lingering uncertainties about the true nature of Oher's conservatorship and the broader implications for legal practices and ethics in such cases.


Money, Tech